These days, many individuals, which includes amazingly almost all practising doctors, still cling on to the existing dogma that Testosterone Replacement Therapy (TRT) for older men is not safe and leads to a heightened incidence of prostate cancer. They accomplish this regardless of the reality that there's not a single shred of data to allow for this folktale and thus there never was.
Where did this figment of the healthcare imagination come from then you might well ask? Search the medical literature as you may, I guarantee you you won't come up with one peer review paper that supports the idea that improving a man's testosterone levels increases the chances of his for developing prostate cancer or maybe any other cancer for that matter. They just are not there. They are not there because the scientific evidence for them isn't there.
However, here is where a lot of doctors may still be confused. In case a male produces metastatic prostate cancer one of the primary lines of therapy for him is going to be to knock out all the testosterone of his.
Today this is ordinarily achieved with ease with medicines as Finasteride. As soon as this particular patient's testosterone levels are reduced to near zero amounts he will go into no less than a short lived remission from his prostate cancer. And so, if really low levels of testosterone are temporarily curative of prostate cancer then certainly it follows that extremely high levels are causative. Would be that not simply good sense?
No, sorry, that is not just common sense and it most certainly is not scientific. This kind of woolly thinking - that if the absence of something is curative after that a lot of the same thing should be causative, is referred to a corollary. Corollaries are usually used in religious debate and mathematical theory.
Corollaries haven't any place in science and certainly no place in medicine. They usually leads you astray & confuse you as clearly they actually do in this particular instance.
Besides, this's likewise worth noting. Prostate cancer is predominately a disease of older men with declining testosterone levels. It is not at all an illness of younger males with high levels of Visit this page (these details) sex hormone circulating in the blood of theirs. How next are you able to argue that testosterone replacement therapy might be beneficial to prostate cancer? Certainly if anything the opposite would be the case though I'm not attempting to make that case here.
Let us then simply place the very last nail in the coffin of this pishogue about testosterone causing cancer. A recently conducted research into the protection of testosterone replacement therapy, performed by M.R. M and Feneley. Carruthers at The Institute of Urology and Nephrology University College, London and also you do not get much grander than that; concluded thus:
The incidence of prostate cancer in this particular group of men (1,500) taken care of with testosterone over quite a few years was equivalent to which expected in the general population.
While I'm at it next, let me just dispel an additional medical myth, popular among doctors regarding TRT. Doctors still cling to the fallacy which, in order to figure out which males should be considered for TRT, it's necessarily to first of all take blood for hormonal level assay. This's not the truth. A recent study carried out by Trinick, Carruthers, Wheeler et al concluded as follows:
Where did this figment of the healthcare imagination come from then you might well ask? Search the medical literature as you may, I guarantee you you won't come up with one peer review paper that supports the idea that improving a man's testosterone levels increases the chances of his for developing prostate cancer or maybe any other cancer for that matter. They just are not there. They are not there because the scientific evidence for them isn't there.
However, here is where a lot of doctors may still be confused. In case a male produces metastatic prostate cancer one of the primary lines of therapy for him is going to be to knock out all the testosterone of his.
Today this is ordinarily achieved with ease with medicines as Finasteride. As soon as this particular patient's testosterone levels are reduced to near zero amounts he will go into no less than a short lived remission from his prostate cancer. And so, if really low levels of testosterone are temporarily curative of prostate cancer then certainly it follows that extremely high levels are causative. Would be that not simply good sense?No, sorry, that is not just common sense and it most certainly is not scientific. This kind of woolly thinking - that if the absence of something is curative after that a lot of the same thing should be causative, is referred to a corollary. Corollaries are usually used in religious debate and mathematical theory.
Corollaries haven't any place in science and certainly no place in medicine. They usually leads you astray & confuse you as clearly they actually do in this particular instance.Besides, this's likewise worth noting. Prostate cancer is predominately a disease of older men with declining testosterone levels. It is not at all an illness of younger males with high levels of Visit this page (these details) sex hormone circulating in the blood of theirs. How next are you able to argue that testosterone replacement therapy might be beneficial to prostate cancer? Certainly if anything the opposite would be the case though I'm not attempting to make that case here.
Let us then simply place the very last nail in the coffin of this pishogue about testosterone causing cancer. A recently conducted research into the protection of testosterone replacement therapy, performed by M.R. M and Feneley. Carruthers at The Institute of Urology and Nephrology University College, London and also you do not get much grander than that; concluded thus:
The incidence of prostate cancer in this particular group of men (1,500) taken care of with testosterone over quite a few years was equivalent to which expected in the general population.
While I'm at it next, let me just dispel an additional medical myth, popular among doctors regarding TRT. Doctors still cling to the fallacy which, in order to figure out which males should be considered for TRT, it's necessarily to first of all take blood for hormonal level assay. This's not the truth. A recent study carried out by Trinick, Carruthers, Wheeler et al concluded as follows:
KOLE-TRANS